Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment on identification of current information and areas of new research

Question

Task: how to identify information and new areas of research using Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment research methods?

Answer

Resources 1:

Annotation

Raju et al. (2020), Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment research on the improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant. This research paper aims to propose a better approach for quantifying the smaller MPs (Microplastics) within a water sample, making it easier to find new microplastic size categories. This research lasted 24 weeks of collecting wastewater and analysing the result according to their MP levels. According to the Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment findings of the first research on MPs in a rural Australian WWTP, MPs were found at all phases of the primary treatment and are regularly discharged towards the Pacific Ocean via WWTP. High levels of glitter were also found in wastewater sludge, indicating that glitter is a significant source of microplastics that needs additional remediation. Therefore, it can be said that it is one of the valuable studies on WWTP that considered microplastics as the main reason for contamination in wastewater and WWTPs can ensure to decontamination of microplastics to further stabilise the WWTP.

Resource 2:

Rahmberg, M., Lovisa Andersson, S., U Lindblom, E. and Johansson, K., 2020. LCA analysis of different WWTP processes.

Annotation

According to Rahmberg et al. (2020), Municipal wastewater treatment facilities (WWTPs) are widely recognised for using energy in their operations, but they also have the potential to generate energy in the form of biogas. When treating wastewater, there are a variety of "standard" process options available based on the wastewater quality, treatment needs, available space, and sense of what constitutes an acceptable solution. The objective of this study by Rahmberg et al. (2020), is to use dynamic system modelling with life cycle assessment. This Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment study compares the environmental effects of wastewater treatments to two different types of industrial effluent (total phosphorus content of 1 mg P/L as well as 0.5 mg P/L) in three distinct process configurations. In total three of the major methods have been evaluated Pre-precipitation (PrePrec), Simultaneous precipitation (SimPrec), and Biological Phosphorous Removal (Bio-P). According to the research process of Rahmberg et al. (2020), it has been found that It is evident that pre-precipitation has a lesser GWP compared to the other setup. For this reason, it can be said that the study by, Rahmberg et al. (2020) is one of the qualified that indicates the GWP method is adequate for WWTP.

Resource 3:

Annotation

According to Krzeminski et al. (2019), In order to close the gaps in processing contamination in WWTPs, the purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of three presently used secondary biological remediation technologies: CAS, MBR, and MBBR. To evaluate the Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment result the researcher had taken samples from 6 different powerplants for 24 weeks with each variable (MBR-2samples, CAS- 2 Samples, MBBR- 2 samples). As the results, Krzeminski et al. (2019) found out that using MBR and MBBR methods inside an EU-wide surveillance assessment measuring the presence of polar chemical pollutants in effluents of Ninety WWTPs, comparable findings were made. Trimethoprim and Voltaren were discovered with frequencies of 81 and 89%, respectively, whereas agomelatine and ciprofloxacin exhibited a frequency of 90% in MBR and MBBR power plants. Therefore, it can be said that CAS is considered the most effective method in WWTP.

Resource 4:

Newhart, K.B., Holloway, R.W., Hering, A.S. and Cath, T.Y., 2019. Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: A review. Water research, 157, pp.498-513.

Annotation

In the words of Newhart et al. (2019), unsupervised methods are those that only use explanatory variables, and their primary purpose is to find patterns in data without having any prior understanding of the relationships WWTP could represent. Therefore, their Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment study is based on the proper methods to address the issue of performance in WWTP processes to remove biological contamination.The researcher has initiated a 52-week survey aiming at the process of powerplants to identify the key issue of inefficiency in US WTTPs. Newhart et al. (2019) found out after initiating a 52-week analysis that, many of the characteristics of WWTP data may be accommodated by random forests, support vector machines, and reinforcement learning, but these methods still need sizable training datasets to fit and must yield accurate results. Some complex approaches may still be avoided in favour of more straightforward yet understandable methodologies because openness in technique is among the keys to acceptance of WWTP operations. In addition to that performance of the WWTPs can be easily improved using big data as the major prevention.

Resource 5:

Gashaye, D., 2020. Wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming in Ethiopia: A review on their potential contamination and health effects. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1), p.1772629.

Annotation

Gashaye (2020) initiate the Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment study in order to identify the main issues in the Wastewater treatment plants that are causing agriculture issues in Australia. Apart from that, another aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of the contamination of water in agriculture in Australia. In this scenario, Gashaye (2020), initiated 24-week-long research and took samples from the after WWTP samples to evaluate the variables; in which he found out that using the methods of MBBR is the primary reason for contamination in the Westlands of Australia. Gashaye (2020), Also elaborate that using the MBBR process reduces the risk of most biological contamination however the contamination of biological chemicals can sometimes be by using this methodology. Therefore, it can be found that not using the MBBR process in WWTP l is the best option.

Resource 6:

Lugo, L.A., Thorarinsdottir, R.I., Bjornsson, S., Palsson, O.P., Skulason, H., Johannsson, S. and Brynjolfsson, S., 2020. Remediation of aquaculture wastewater using the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana. Water, 12(11), p.3144.

Annotation

According to Lugo et al. (2020), The study's objective was to assess the viability of employing a microalga Chlorella sorokiniana in a large-scale photobioreactor for the phytoremediation recycling aquaculture wastewater (AWW). Although prior research has been done to determine if the microalgae sorokiniana may be used to remediate AWW, such studies have only been done utilising small-scale systems. As per the Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment result of the 52-week process initiated by Lugo et al. (2020), it has been found that implementing the microalga chlorella sorokiniana is a very effective method in order to reduce the contamination in water especially since it works very well with biological contamination. For this reason, it can be said that it is one of the essential research projects that showed an innovative way to reduce the biological contamination from water through WWTP.

Resource 7:

Annotation

The aim of the study by Chan et al. (2021) is to velvet the prospects of microplastics in the water after the process of WWTP. The researcher has taken samples before and after WTTP each week to evaluate the variables for 24 weeks. The results from the study were relatively shocking. The study reveals that most of the wastewater treatment plants in China use the method of MBS in order to initiate the whole process however the Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment study indicates that the number of microplastics increased after the whole process indicates the process of MBS is extremely inefficient in terms of biological contaminant. For this reason, it can be said that it is extremely essential to avoid the MBS method in order to prevent microplastic contamination in the WWTP.

Resource 8:

Gagneten, A.M., Romero, N., Reno, U., Regaldo, L., Kergaravat, S.V., Rodenak?Kladniew, B.E. and Castro, G.R., 2021. Silver nanoparticle filter for domestic wastewater reuse. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 96(8), pp.2152-2158.

Annotation

According to Gagnetenet al. (2021), the goal of the work was to create a cellulose filter that has been heavily doped with nanoparticles for the purification of urban wastewater (UW) effluent for use on a residential scale in sanitary facilities, gardening, or other applications. AgNPs were created, and mammalian cell cultures were used to test for toxicity for 52 weeks to evaluate the variables. As a result, it is found that AgNP is extremely efficient and effective in order to decontaminate wastewater and should be included in WWTP. For this reason, it can be said that it is one of the Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment researches that evaluate the effectiveness of AgNP in the purification method of WWTP.

References

Raju, S., Carbery, M., Kuttykattil, A., Senthirajah, K., Lundmark, A., Rogers, Z., Suresh, S.C.B., Evans, G. and Palanisami, T., 2020. Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant. Water research, 173, p.115549. Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment Rahmberg, M., Lovisa Andersson, S., U Lindblom, E. and Johansson, K., 2020. LCA analysis of different WWTP processes.

Krzeminski, P., Tomei, M.C., Karaolia, P., Langenhoff, A., Almeida, C.M.R., Felis, E., Gritten, F., Andersen, H.R., Fernandes, T., Manaia, C.M. and Rizzo, L., 2019. Performance of secondary wastewater treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern implicated in crop uptake and antibiotic resistance spread: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 648, pp.1052-1081. Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment Newhart, K.B., Holloway, R.W., Hering, A.S. and Cath, T.Y., 2019. Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: A review. Water research, 157, pp.498-513.

Gashaye, D., 2020. Wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming in Ethiopia: A review on their potential contamination and health effects. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1), p.1772629.Lugo, L.A., Thorarinsdottir, R.I., Bjornsson, S., Palsson, O.P., Skulason, H., Johannsson, S. and Brynjolfsson, S., 2020. Remediation of aquaculture wastewater using the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana. Water, 12(11), p.3144. Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment

Chan, C.K., Park, C., Chan, K.M., Mak, D.C., Fang, J.K. and Mitrano, D.M., 2021. Microplastic fibre releases from industrial wastewater effluent: a textile wet-processing mill in China. Environmental Chemistry, 18(3), pp.93-100Gagneten, A.M., Romero, N., Reno, U., Regaldo, L., Kergaravat, S.V., Rodenak?Kladniew, B.E. and Castro, G.R., 2021. Silver nanoparticle filter for domestic wastewater reuse. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 96(8), pp.2152-2158. Microbiology annotated bibliography assignment

Tags: microbiology annotated bibliography

NEXT SAMPLE